Abstract
Microhabitats are fine subdivisions of habitat where the greatest differentiation in resource use by anuran communities often occurs. In this study, we analyzed microhabitat use and niche overlap for four hylid frog species from fish ponds at the Universidad de los Llanos in Meta, Colombia. During 12 nocturnal field surveys over a four-month period, we recorded three microhabitat variables used by frogs: substrate type, vertical position, and vegetation type. From this data, we calculated niche breadth and community niche overlap indices based on 31–79 observations for each species. The frogs frequented leaf and branch substrates, low and mid-range vertical positions, and shrubby and herbaceous vegetation. Dendropsophus mathiassoni, Dendropsophus minutus and Scinax rostratus had low niche breadths for all three measured microhabitat variables, whereas Boana platanera had an intermediate niche breadth for substrate use and high niche breadths for vertical position and vegetation type used. The community niche overlap index tested against null models showed a random distribution of ecological resource use, indicating the absence of ecological mechanisms influencing niche overlap in the community.
References
Cloyed CS, Eason PK. (2017). Niche partitioning and the role of intraspecific niche variation in structuring a guild of generalist anurans. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4(3): 170060. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170060
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170060
Prasad VK, Chuang MF, Das A, Ramesh K, Yi Y, Dinesh KP, Borzée, A. (2022). Coexisting good neighbours: acoustic and calling microhabitat niche partitioning in two elusive syntopic species of balloon frogs, Uperodon systoma and U. globulosus (Anura: Microhylidae) and potential of individual vocal signatures. BMC Zool. 7(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-022-00132-x
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40850-022-00132-x
Protazio A, Protazio A, Mesquita DO. (2019). Niche partitioning between two Physalaemus species (Anura, Leptodactylidae) in semiarid Caatinga in Northeast Brazil. North-West. J. Zool. 15(2): 157-167. https://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/content/v15n2/nwjz_e191501_Protazio.pdf
Inger R. (1994). Microhabitat Description. In WR Heyer, MA Donnelly, RW Mcdiarmid, LC Hayek, MS. Foster (Eds). Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA. p. 60-66.
Muñoz-Guerrero J, Serrano VH, Ramírez-Pinilla MP. (2007). Uso de microhábitat, dieta y tiempo de actividad en cuatro especies simpátricas de ranas hílidas neotropicales (Anura: Hylidae). Caldasia 29(2): 413-425. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/72928
Chinchilla-Lemus W, Serrano-Cardozo VH, Ramírez-Pinilla, MP. (2020). Reproductive activity, microhabitat use, and calling sites of Pristimantis bacchus (Anura: Craugastoridae). Amphib-reptil. 41(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-20191200
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-20191200
Palacios-Rodriguez LJ, Rengifo-Mosquera JT, Roa M, Palacios Y. (2018). Riqueza y distribución de hílidos (Hylidae: Anura) en zona de bosques pluvial tropical en el departamento del Chocó, Colombia. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim. Recia 10(2): 154-166. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v10.n2.2018.650
https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v10.n2.2018.650
Nieva-Cocilio RA, Acosta JC, Blanco GM. (2020). Uso y selección de microhábitat en un ensamble de anuros del Chaco Serrano de Argentina. Rev. Biol. Trop. 68(3): 862-872. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i3.40390
https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i3.40390
Williams B, Grantham H, Watson J, Alvarez SJ, Simmonds JS, Rogeliz CA, Silva MD, Forero-Medina G, Etter A, Nogales J, Walschburger T, Hyman G, Beyer H. (2020). Minimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural development. Environ. Res. Lett. 15(1): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ff7
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ff7
Brüninga LZ, Kriegerc M, Meneses-Pelayo E, Eisenhauerb N, Ramírez MP, Reud B, Ernst, R. (2018). Land-use heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture promotes amphibian diversity in montane agroforestry systems of northeast Colombia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 264: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.011
Saunders D, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Biol. Conserv. 5(1): 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x
Cáceres-Andrade S, Urbina-Cardona J. (2009). Ensamblajes de anuros de sistemas productivos y bosques en el piedemonte llanero, departamento del Meta, Colombia. Caldasia 31(1): 175-194. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/71204
Frost DR. (2021). Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference. Version 6.2. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Consultado Diciembre 15, 2004, en https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/
Blanco-Torres A, Baruffol M, Acosta A, Nuñez NB. (2019). Rasgos funcionales de anfibios de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/119311
Avendaño JE, Tejeiro N, Díaz-Cárdenas J, Amaya-Burgos JJ, Aponte AF, Gamboa N, Esmeralda Y, Salcedo-Sarmiento J, Velásquez-Suárez AJ, Morales-Rozo A. (2018). Birds of Universidad de los Llanos (Villavicencio, Colombia): a rich community at the andean foothills-savanna transition. Bol. Cient. Mus. Hist. 22(2): 51-75. https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2018.22.2.5
https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2018.22.2.5
Mendoza JS. (2014). Aportes para la identificación de las ranas gladiadoras del género hypsiboas (wagler,1830); (Anura: Hylidae), presentes en las tierras bajas del caribe colombiano. Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim. Recia, 6(1): 55-69. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v6.n1.2014.203
https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v6.n1.2014.203
Minorta-Cely V, Rangel-Ch JO. (2014). El clima de la Orinoquia colombiana. En JO Rangel-Ch (Ed). Colombia Diversidad Biótica XIV. La región de la Orinoquía de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. p. 207-236.
Lips KR, Reaser J, Young B, Ibáñez R. 2001. Amphibian monitoring in Latin America: a protocol manual. Society of Study Amphibians and Reptiles, Washington, D.C., USA.
Cochran DM, Goin CJ. (1970). Frogs of Colombia. United States National Museum, Bulletin, Washington, D.C., USA.
https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.288.1
Escalona SM, La Marca E, Castellanos-Montero MC, Fouquet A, Crawford AJ, Rojas-Runjaic FJM, Giaretta AA, Señaris JC, Castroviejo-Fisher S. (2021). Integrative taxonomy reveals a new but common Neotropical treefrog, hidden under the name Boana xerophylla. Zootaxa 4981: 401-448. https://doi.org/10.1164/zootaxa.4981.3.1)
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4981.3.1
Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ. (1971). On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52(4): 567-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934144
https://doi.org/10.2307/1934144
Cadavid JG, Román-Valencia C, Gómez AF. (2005). Composición y estructura de anfibios anuros en un transecto altitudinal de los Andes Centrales de Colombia. Rev. Mus. Argent. Cienc. Nat. 7(2): 103- 118. http://revista.macn.gob.ar/ojs/index.php/RevMus/article/view/329/313
https://doi.org/10.22179/REVMACN.7.329
Vargas F, Castro F. (1999). Distribución y preferencias de microhábitat en anuros (Amphibia) en bosque maduro y áreas perturbadas en Anchicayá, Pacífico Colombiano. Caldasia 21(1): 95-109. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/31123
Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas JG, de Vos AC, Buchmann N, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, ter Steege H, van der Heijden MGA, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC. (2013). New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 61(3): 167-234. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
Hurlbert SH. (1978). The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59(1): 67-77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936632
https://doi.org/10.2307/1936632
Grossman GD. (1986). Food resources partitioning in a rocky intertidal fish assemblage. J. Zool. 1(2): 317-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00642.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00642.x
Pianka ER. (1973). The structure of lizard communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 4:53-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413
Gotelli NJ, Entsminger G. (2015). EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Jericho, VT 05465. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16504
Inger RF, Colwell RK. (1977). Organization of contiguous communities of amphibians and reptiles in Thailand. Ecol. Monogr. 47(3): 229-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942516
https://doi.org/10.2307/1942516
Albrecht M, Gotelli NJ. (2001). Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia 126:134-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000494
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000494
Winemiller KO, Pianka ER. 1990. Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes. Ecol. Monogr. 60(1):27-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943025
https://doi.org/10.2307/1943025
Gotelli NJ, Graves GR. (1996). Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
Romero H, Rangel-Ch JO, Carvajal-C JE. (2014). Anfibios de la Orinoquia de Colombia lista con base en los registros existentes. En JO Rangel-Ch (Ed). Colombia Diversidad Biótica XIV. La región de la Orinoquía de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. p. 665-690
Lynch JD. (2006). The amphibian fauna in the Villavicencio region of eastern Colombia. Caldasia 28(1): 135-155. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/72984
Rodríguez L, Duellman W. 1994. Guide to the frogs of the Iquitos Region, amazonian Peru. Asociación de Ecología y Conservación. Amazon Center for Environmental Education and Research, Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Kansas, USA. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7937
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.7937
Crump ML. (1971). Quantitative analysis of the ecological distribution of a topical herpetofauna. Occas. pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas 3: 1-63. https://biostor.org/reference/50148
Huckembeck S, Winemiller KO, Loebmann D, Garcia AM. (2018). Trophic ecology of two sympatric frogs with contrasting morphology and habitat use in a subtropical wetland. Herpetologica 74(3): 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-17-00069.1
https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-17-00069.1
Alves R, Rodríguez F. (2017). Notes on an unusual position of calling site of Dendropsophus minutus (Peters, 1872) (Anura: Hylidae), northeastern São Paulo, Brazil. Herpetol. Notes 10: 421-423. https://www.biotaxa.org/hn/article/view/22695
Lynch JD, Suarez AM. (2001). The distributions of the gladiator frogs (Hyla boans group) in Colombia, with comments on size variation and sympatry. Caldasia 23(2): 491-507. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/31289
Tracy CR, Christian KA, O'connor MP, Tracy CR. (1993). Behavioral thermoregulation by Bufo americanus: the importance of the hydric environment. Herpetologica 49(3) :375-82. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3892756
Acosta-Ortiz JM. (2022). Evaluación preliminar de la relación entre el tamaño corporal y la amplitud de nicho de la familia Leptodactylidae (Amphibia: anura), en dos localidades del departamento de Casanare, Colombia. Tesis de pregrado, Universidad de los Llanos, Villavicencio, Colombia. https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/2975
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA DE LA ASOCIACION COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS